On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 4:06 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't think that moving fsm tests to brin would be a good approach. > We want to have a separate test for each access method. I think if we > want to do something to avoid portability issues, maybe we can do what > Masahiko San has just suggested.
We could also use the same plpgsql loop as in fsm.sql to check the ctid, right? > OTOH, I think we are just good w.r.t > this issue with the last patch I sent. I think unless we see some > problem here, we should put energy into having a reproducible test for > the fourth problem mentioned in my mail up thread [1]. Do you think > it makes sense to run make check in loop for multiple times or do you > have any idea how we can have a reproducible test? Okay. Earlier I tried running make installcheck with force_parallel_mode='regress', but didn't get a failure. I may not have run enough times, though. I'll have to think about how to induce it. -- John Naylor https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
