On Tuesday, January 29, 2019, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Merlin Moncure <mmonc...@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 1:53 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> I propose that we implement and document this as
> >> WITH ctename AS [ MATERIALIZE { ON | OFF } ] ( query )
>
> > I hate to bikeshed here, but I think it's better english using that
> > style of syntax to say,
> > WITH ctename AS [ MATERIALIZATION { ON | OFF } ] ( query )
>
> Hm. Doesn't really seem to fit with our style for options elsewhere;
> for instance, EXPLAIN's options are things like ANALYZE ON/OFF and
> VERBOSE ON/OFF, not ANALYSIS and VERBOSITY.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
Yep...I'll concede the point.
merlin
