"Daniel Verite" <dan...@manitou-mail.org> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> A variant that might or might not be safer is "\g <foo", ie we >> insist on you putting a mark there that shows you intended to read.
> I haven't written any patch yet, but I was thinking of submitting
> something like that, with the addition of "\g >foo" as a synonym of
> "\g foo" for the symmetry with "<".
+1, the same had occurred to me.
regards, tom lane
