Jim Finnerty <jfinn...@amazon.com> writes:
> It's related, but what I was referring to applies even to the uncorrelated
> case: suppose you have something like:
> select x, sum(z)
> from t
> where
> x > 5 and y in ('a', 'b', 'c')
> group by x;
> let's say that 'a', 'b', and 'c' are not frequent values of y, so the
> estimated selectivity is based on the n_distinct of y and the 3 values. Now
> imagine that x > 5 is applied first. That reduces the number of qualifying
> rows by the selectivity of (x > 5), but it may also reduce the number of
> distinct values of y. If it reduces the n_distinct of y, then the IN
> predicate selectivity should be adjusted also.
I don't actually think that's a foregone conclusion. If the two where
clauses are in fact independent, then simply multiplying their
selectivities together is the right thing.
regards, tom lane
