On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 05:38:59PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > With our scanner keywords list now more cache-aware, and with us > planning to use Bison for years to come, has anyone ever looked at > reordering the bison state machine array to be more cache aware, e.g., > having common states next to each other rather than scattered around the > array?
Do we have a pretty good idea of what commonly grouped states are, or at least a way to get some not-awful estimates of what they are? Best, David. -- David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
