On 2019-Jan-25, Michael Paquier wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 08:56:05AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Uh, I didn't think it was necessary nor desirable to rename the flag,
> > only the user-visible message.
> 
> Oh, OK.  I have overstated your comment then.  Are you fine with the
> attached instead?  The flag name remains the same, and the comment is
> updated.

I am, except that the change of "table" to "object" in xact.c line 2262
makes the new paragraph read a bit weird -- it's now saying "if we've
added a temp object ...   Other objects have the same problem".  Doesn't
make sense.  If you keep that word as "table", it works fine.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Reply via email to