On 2019-Jan-25, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 08:56:05AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Uh, I didn't think it was necessary nor desirable to rename the flag, > > only the user-visible message. > > Oh, OK. I have overstated your comment then. Are you fine with the > attached instead? The flag name remains the same, and the comment is > updated.
I am, except that the change of "table" to "object" in xact.c line 2262 makes the new paragraph read a bit weird -- it's now saying "if we've added a temp object ... Other objects have the same problem". Doesn't make sense. If you keep that word as "table", it works fine. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services