On 1/24/19 10:34 PM, John Naylor wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 4:17 PM Tomas Vondra > <tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> I can still see about the same performance as before (on both clusters). > > Thanks for checking! I think the thing to do now is have a committer > look at it. It's a small patch with obvious performance effects -- > there's just the question of whether the locking behavior with > concurrent DDL is as safe as it is now. > > Anyone have anything else? > Yes, I don't see why would the patch change that and I've been looking for such cases. I think David was looking at that this week too, and I assume he'll send an update if he finds anything. If not, I plan to get it committed soon-ish (possibly next week after the FOSDEM dev meeting, unless there are some objections). regards -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
- Re: Delay locking partitions during INSERT and UPDATE sho kato
- Re: Delay locking partitions during INSERT and UPDATE David Rowley
- RE: Delay locking partitions during INSERT and UPDA... Kato, Sho
- Re: Delay locking partitions during INSERT and ... John Naylor
- Re: Delay locking partitions during INSERT ... David Rowley
- Re: Delay locking partitions during IN... John Naylor
- Re: Delay locking partitions durin... David Rowley
- Re: Delay locking partitions d... John Naylor
- Re: Delay locking partitions d... Tomas Vondra
- Re: Delay locking partitions d... John Naylor
- Re: Delay locking partitions d... Tomas Vondra
- Re: Delay locking partitions d... Robert Haas
- Re: Delay locking partitions d... David Rowley
- Re: Delay locking partitions d... Robert Haas
- Re: Delay locking partitions d... David Rowley
- Re: Delay locking partitions d... Robert Haas
- Re: Delay locking partitions d... Andres Freund
- Re: Delay locking partitions d... Tom Lane
- Re: Delay locking partitions d... David Rowley
- Re: Delay locking partitions d... Tom Lane
- Re: Delay locking partitions d... Andres Freund