Andrew Gierth <and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes: > I propose that it should not ignore rowMarks, per the attached patch or > something similar.
+1 for not ignoring rowMarks, but this patch seems like a hack to me.
Why didn't you just add RowMarkClause as one of the known alternative
expression node types? There's no advantage to hard-wiring such
restrictive assumptions about where it can appear.
regards, tom lane
