On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 10:02:47AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: >> You are right, we definitely should. I'll go ahead and fix that. I can't >> quite make up my mind on if it's a good idea to backpatch that though -- >> it's certainly safe enough to do, but it might cause issues for translators? > > Yeah, weak -1 for back-patching. We don't usually like to thrash > translatable messages in the back branches.
Yes, I think that it is better to not bother about back-branches and just do that on HEAD. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
