Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 02:00:57AM +0000, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
>> The original desire should have been the ability to connect to a
>> primary or a standby. So, I think we should go back to the original
>> thinking (and not complicate the feature), and create a read only
>> GUC_REPORT variable, say, server_role, that identifies whether the
>> server is a primary or a standby.
> From the point of view of making sure that a client is really
> connected to a primary or a standby, this is the best idea around.
There are a couple of issues here:
1. Are you sure there are no use-cases for testing transaction_read_only
as such?
2. What will the fallback implementation be, when connecting to a server
too old to have the variable you want?
regards, tom lane
