On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 11:04 PM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 2019-01-08 11:30:56 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > On 08/01/2019 00:56, Andres Freund wrote: > > > A patch at [2] adds display of a table's access method to \d+ - but that > > > means that running the tests with a different default table access > > > method (e.g. using PGOPTIONS='-c default_table_access_method=...) > > > there'll be a significant number of test failures, even though the test > > > results did not meaningfully differ. > > > > For psql, a variable that hides the access method if it's the default. > > Yea, I think that seems the least contentious solution. >
+1. > Don't like it > too much, but it seems better than the alternative. I wonder if we want > one for multiple regression related issues, or whether one specifically > about table AMs is more appropriate. I lean towards the latter. > I didn't understand what is the earlier part "I wonder if we want one for multiple regression related issues". What do you mean by multiple regression related issues? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
