On 1/5/19 1:11 AM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 2:23 AM Nikita Glukhov <n.glu...@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
>> 2) We define both DCH_FF# and DCH_ff#, but we never ever use the
>> lower-case version. Heck, it's not mentioned even in DCH_keywords, which
>> does this:
>>
>> ...
>> {"FF1", 3, DCH_FF1, false, FROM_CHAR_DATE_NONE}, /* F */
>> ...
>> {"ff1", 3, DCH_FF1, false, FROM_CHAR_DATE_NONE}, /* F */
>> ...
>>
>> Compare that to DCH_DAY, DCH_Day and DCH_day, mapped to "DAY", "Day" and
>> "day".
>>
>> Yes, "ff#" are mapped to DCH_FF# like "mi" is mapped DCH_MI.
>>
>> "Day", "day" are not mapped to DCH_DAY because they determine letter case in
>> the
>> output, but "ff1" and "FF#" output contains only digits.
>
> Right, DCH_poz is also offset in DCH_keywords array. So, if array has
> an entry for "ff1" then enum should have a DCH_ff1 member in the same
> position.
>
I guess my question is why we define DCH_ff# at all, when it's not
mapped in DCH_keywords? ISTM we could simply leave them out of all the
arrays, no? Of course, this is not specific to this patch, as it applies
to pre-existing items (like DCH_mi).
regards
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
