On 2018-Dec-28, Michael Paquier wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 09:36:57AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > like the attached perhaps?  At the same time I am thinking about
> > reformulating the second sentence as well..
> >
> >  /*
> > - * This is default value for wal_segment_size to be used at initdb when run
> > - * without --walsegsize option. Must be a valid segment size.
> > + * This is the default value for wal_segment_size to be used when initdb 
> > is run
> > + * without the --wal-segsize option.  It must be a valid segment size.
> >   */
> >  #define DEFAULT_XLOG_SEG_SIZE      (16*1024*1024)
> 
> So, any objections with this change?  If somebody has a better
> wording, please feel free to chime in.

Looks good to me.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Reply via email to