On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 08:46:25PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > One thing I was wondering is if we should try to enforce a policy > like this by putting, say, > > #define random() pg_random() > > into port.h or so. That would have the advantages of not having to touch > any existing calls and not having to worry too much about future patches > breaking the policy. On the other hand, it's conceivable that third-party > extensions might get annoyed with us for hijacking a libc function. > Thoughts?
Not much a fan of that for random() to be honest as we are talking about 15 callers in the backend code and enforcing a call of in a low-level library.. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
