On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 01:57:40PM +0000, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote: > Yeah, because of that we can't do the obvious HeadMatches("CREATE", > "TABLE") && (TailMatches(...) || TailMatches(...) || ...). I believe > this would require extending the match syntax with regex-like grouping, > alternation and repetition operators, which I'm not volunteering to > do.
That seems to be a lot of work for little benefit as few queries are able to work within CREATE SCHEMA, so I would not take this road. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature