On 12/20/18 10:56 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 6:05 PM David Steele <da...@pgmasters.net> wrote:
The question in my mind: is it safe to back-patch?
I cannot imagine it being a good idea to stick a behavioral change
like this into a minor release. Yeah, it lets people get out from
under this problem a lot sooner, but it potentially breaks backup
scripts even for people who were not suffering in the first place. I
don't think solving this problem for the people who have it is worth
inflicting that kind of breakage on everybody.
Fair enough -- figured I would make an argument and see what people thought.
It's easy enough to solve on my end, but I'll wait and see what naming
scheme we come up with.
--
-David
da...@pgmasters.net
