David Rowley <david.row...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> I've attached the trivial patch which implements 64-bit Bitmapsets.
> One caveat about this may be that it will likely slow performance for
> 32-bit machines. My current thinking about that is that such a
> platform is likely not that common a target for the latest version of
> PostgreSQL.
Yeah, I think we've been optimizing for 64-bit platforms for awhile.
I'm not prepared to abandon "it works on 32-bit", but I don't see a
reason to sacrifice 64-bit performance to improve the 32-bit case.
> However, I doubt it would take much more effort to maintain
> using 32-bit sets on 32-bit machines. If someone feels strongly about
> that then I can adjust the patch to allow that.
Hm, are you thinking of making BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD match sizeof(Pointer)
or something like that? That seems like a good compromise from here.
regards, tom lane
