On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 12:23:09PM +0300, Sergei Kornilov wrote: > Not sure i can be reviewer since this was initially my proposal.
No issues from me if you wish to review the code. In my opinion, it is not a problem if you are a reviewer as I wrote the code. > I vote +1 for this patch. Code looks good and i think we have no > reason to leave RequestXLogStreaming as-is. Thanks for the input. The take on my side is to be able to remove ready_to_display from WalRcv so let's see what others think. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
