On Wednesday, December 5, 2018 4:59:18 PM CET Stephen Frost wrote: > This change doesn't seem to make any sense to me..? If anything, seems > like we'd end up overallocating memory *after* this change, where we > don't today (though an analyzer tool might complain because we don't > free the memory from it and instead copy the pointer from each of these > items into the tbinfo structure).
Correct, I haven't think that one through. I was confused that some items related to the dropped columns could be unreferenced. But those are anyways allocated as a solid block with others (not intended to be ever free()'d). Feel free to ignore that. Thanks for looking at this! Pavel
