(2018/11/30 18:51), Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> (2018/11/28 13:38), Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>> BTW another thing I noticed is this comment on costing aggregate
>> pushdown paths using local statistics in estimate_path_cost_size:
>>
>>                * Also, core does not care about costing HAVING expressions 
>> and
>>                * adding that to the costs.  So similarly, here too we are not
>>                * considering remote and local conditions for costing.
>>
>> I think this was true when aggregate pushdown went in, but isn't anymore
>> because of commit 7b6c07547190f056b0464098bb5a2247129d7aa2.  So we
>> should update estimate_path_cost_size so that it accounts for the
>> selectivity and cost of the HAVING expressions as well?
> 
> There seems to be no objections, I updated the patch as such.  Attached
> is an updated version of the patch.

I revised some comments a bit and added the commit message.  Attached is
an updated patch.  If there are no objections, I'll apply this to HEAD only.

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
>From 1596c46b0531b9ca2433352e47e70cf1f22d4f44 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Etsuro Fujita <efuj...@postgresql.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 19:52:47 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] postgres_fdw: Improve cost and size estimation for aggregte
 pushdown

In commit 7012b132d07c2b4ea15b0b3cb1ea9f3278801d98, which added aggregate
pushdown to postgres_fdw, we didn't account for the evaluation cost and the
selectivity of HAVING quals attached to ForeignPaths performing aggregate
pushdown, as core had never accounted for that for AggPaths and GroupPaths.
And we didn't set these values of the locally-checked quals (ie, fpinfo's
local_conds_cost and local_conds_sel), which were initialized to zeros, but
since estimate_path_cost_size factors in these to estimate the result size
and the evaluation cost of such a ForeignPath when the use_remote_estimate
option is enabled, this caused it to produce underestimated results in that
mode.

By commit 7b6c07547190f056b0464098bb5a2247129d7aa2 core was changed so that
it accounts for the evaluation cost and the selectivity of HAVING quals in
aggregation paths, so change the postgres_fdw's aggregate pushdown code as
well as such.  This not only fixes the underestimation issue mentioned
above, but improves the estimation using local statistics in that function
when that option is diabled.

This would be a bug fix rather than an improvement, but apply it to HEAD
only to avoid destabilizing existing plan choices.

Author: Etsuro Fujita
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5BFD3EAD.2060301%40lab.ntt.co.jp
---
 contrib/postgres_fdw/expected/postgres_fdw.out |  2 +
 contrib/postgres_fdw/postgres_fdw.c            | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
 contrib/postgres_fdw/sql/postgres_fdw.sql      |  3 ++
 3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/contrib/postgres_fdw/expected/postgres_fdw.out b/contrib/postgres_fdw/expected/postgres_fdw.out
index e653c30..dfa6201 100644
--- a/contrib/postgres_fdw/expected/postgres_fdw.out
+++ b/contrib/postgres_fdw/expected/postgres_fdw.out
@@ -3209,6 +3209,8 @@ select array_agg(c1 order by c1 using operator(public.<^)) from ft2 where c2 = 6
          Remote SQL: SELECT "C 1", c2 FROM "S 1"."T 1" WHERE (("C 1" < 100)) AND ((c2 = 6))
 (6 rows)
 
+-- Update local stats on ft2
+ANALYZE ft2;
 -- Add into extension
 alter extension postgres_fdw add operator class my_op_class using btree;
 alter extension postgres_fdw add function my_op_cmp(a int, b int);
diff --git a/contrib/postgres_fdw/postgres_fdw.c b/contrib/postgres_fdw/postgres_fdw.c
index d22c974..159bf4b 100644
--- a/contrib/postgres_fdw/postgres_fdw.c
+++ b/contrib/postgres_fdw/postgres_fdw.c
@@ -2844,10 +2844,6 @@ estimate_path_cost_size(PlannerInfo *root,
 			 * strategy will be considered at remote side, thus for
 			 * simplicity, we put all startup related costs in startup_cost
 			 * and all finalization and run cost are added in total_cost.
-			 *
-			 * Also, core does not care about costing HAVING expressions and
-			 * adding that to the costs.  So similarly, here too we are not
-			 * considering remote and local conditions for costing.
 			 */
 
 			ofpinfo = (PgFdwRelationInfo *) fpinfo->outerrel->fdw_private;
@@ -2880,10 +2876,26 @@ estimate_path_cost_size(PlannerInfo *root,
 											input_rows, NULL);
 
 			/*
-			 * Number of rows expected from foreign server will be same as
-			 * that of number of groups.
+			 * Get the retrieved-rows and rows estimates.  If there are HAVING
+			 * quals, account for their selectivity.
 			 */
-			rows = retrieved_rows = numGroups;
+			if (root->parse->havingQual)
+			{
+				/* Factor in the selectivity of the remotely-checked quals */
+				retrieved_rows =
+					clamp_row_est(numGroups *
+								  clauselist_selectivity(root,
+														 fpinfo->remote_conds,
+														 0,
+														 JOIN_INNER,
+														 NULL));
+				/* Factor in the selectivity of the locally-checked quals */
+				rows = clamp_row_est(retrieved_rows * fpinfo->local_conds_sel);
+			}
+			else
+			{
+				rows = retrieved_rows = numGroups;
+			}
 
 			/*-----
 			 * Startup cost includes:
@@ -2909,6 +2921,20 @@ estimate_path_cost_size(PlannerInfo *root,
 			run_cost += aggcosts.finalCost * numGroups;
 			run_cost += cpu_tuple_cost * numGroups;
 			run_cost += ptarget->cost.per_tuple * numGroups;
+
+			/* Accout for the eval cost of HAVING quals, if any */
+			if (root->parse->havingQual)
+			{
+				QualCost	remote_cost;
+
+				/* Add in the eval cost of the remotely-checked quals */
+				cost_qual_eval(&remote_cost, fpinfo->remote_conds, root);
+				startup_cost += remote_cost.startup;
+				run_cost += remote_cost.per_tuple * numGroups;
+				/* Add in the eval cost of the locally-checked quals */
+				startup_cost += fpinfo->local_conds_cost.startup;
+				run_cost += fpinfo->local_conds_cost.per_tuple * retrieved_rows;
+			}
 		}
 		else
 		{
@@ -5496,6 +5522,22 @@ add_foreign_grouping_paths(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *input_rel,
 	if (!foreign_grouping_ok(root, grouped_rel, extra->havingQual))
 		return;
 
+	/*
+	 * Compute the selectivity and cost of the local_conds, so we don't have
+	 * to do it over again for each path.  (Currently we create just a single
+	 * path here, but in future it would be possible that we build more paths
+	 * such as pre-sorted paths as in postgresGetForeignPaths and
+	 * postgresGetForeignJoinPaths.)  The best we can do for these conditions
+	 * is to estimate selectivity on the basis of local statistics.
+	 */
+	fpinfo->local_conds_sel = clauselist_selectivity(root,
+													 fpinfo->local_conds,
+													 0,
+													 JOIN_INNER,
+													 NULL);
+
+	cost_qual_eval(&fpinfo->local_conds_cost, fpinfo->local_conds, root);
+
 	/* Estimate the cost of push down */
 	estimate_path_cost_size(root, grouped_rel, NIL, NIL, &rows,
 							&width, &startup_cost, &total_cost);
diff --git a/contrib/postgres_fdw/sql/postgres_fdw.sql b/contrib/postgres_fdw/sql/postgres_fdw.sql
index 6aa9a7f..f963e99 100644
--- a/contrib/postgres_fdw/sql/postgres_fdw.sql
+++ b/contrib/postgres_fdw/sql/postgres_fdw.sql
@@ -807,6 +807,9 @@ create operator class my_op_class for type int using btree family my_op_family a
 explain (verbose, costs off)
 select array_agg(c1 order by c1 using operator(public.<^)) from ft2 where c2 = 6 and c1 < 100 group by c2;
 
+-- Update local stats on ft2
+ANALYZE ft2;
+
 -- Add into extension
 alter extension postgres_fdw add operator class my_op_class using btree;
 alter extension postgres_fdw add function my_op_cmp(a int, b int);
-- 
1.8.3.1

Reply via email to