On Sat, Dec 01, 2018 at 10:51:10AM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: > On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 23:08, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: >> It is not complicated to >> handle duplicates for xacts and subxacts however holding ProcArrayLock >> for a longer time stresses me as it is already a bottleneck. > > I hadn't realised this patch holds ProcArrayLock while removing duplicates. > Now I know I vote against applying this patch unless someone can show that > the performance effects of doing so are negligable, which I doubt.
Me too after more thoughts on that. Please note that I have marked the patch as returned with feedback for now. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
