On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:29:04PM -0800, Noah Misch wrote: > This patch provides no meaningful increment in security or reliability, but it > does improve stylistic consistency. Fine to proceed on those grounds, but > this description doesn't fit.
Indeed, you are right. I agree. > > --- a/src/test/modules/worker_spi/worker_spi.c > > +++ b/src/test/modules/worker_spi/worker_spi.c > > @@ -115,7 +115,9 @@ initialize_worker_spi(worktable *table) > > > > /* XXX could we use CREATE SCHEMA IF NOT EXISTS? */ > > initStringInfo(&buf); > > - appendStringInfo(&buf, "select count(*) from pg_namespace where nspname > > = '%s'", > > + appendStringInfo(&buf, > > + "select pg_catalog.count(*) " > > + "from pg_catalog.pg_namespace where > > nspname = '%s'", > > table->schema); > > Remove this change. The rest of the file doesn't schema-qualify, which is > appropriate for code implementing a test case. No problem with that either. Thanks Noah for the lookup. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature