On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 1:17 AM Dmitry Dolgov <9erthali...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 8:54 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 07:03:47PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > > > I think Robert's chash stuff [1] might be helpful to reduce the contention > > > you are seeing. > > > > Latest patch available does not apply, so I moved it to next CF. The > > thread has died a bit as well... > > Unfortunately, patch is still needs to be rebased. Could you do this, are > there > any plans about the patch?
I have a plan but it's a future plan. This patch is for parallel vacuum patch. As I mentioned at that thread[1], I'm focusing on only parallel index vacuum, which would not require the relation extension lock improvements for now. Therefore, I want to withdraw this patch and to reactivate when we need this enhancement. So I think we can mark it as 'Returned with feedback'. [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAD21AoDhAutvKbQ37Btf4taMVbQaOaSvOpxpLgu814T1-OqYGg%40mail.gmail.com Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center
