On 2018/11/28 13:46, Amit Langote wrote: > It's cheaper than using a cached generic plan (without re-planning), > because the latter has to pay the cost of AcquireExecutorLocks which takes > longer as the number of partitions increases. Perhaps something to try > fix fixing too. Not planning should cost less than planning! :)
Ah, I see that David has already thought about this issue. (last paragraph of this email) https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKJS1f-ibmyn1W_UsdSmygjKOL6YgPyX0Mz54V_iD0HWWL_h%3Dg%40mail.gmail.com Thanks, Amit
