On 2018-11-26 15:09:43 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2018-Nov-26, Stephen Frost wrote: > > > I would think we'd have the different GUCs and then the check functions > > would only validate that they're valid inputs and then when we get to > > the point where we're starting to do recovery we check and make sure > > we've been given a sane overall configuration- which means that only > > *one* is set, and it matches the recovery target requested. > > I don't quite understand why it isn't sensible to specify more than one > and just stop recovery (or whatever) when at least one of them becomes > true. Maybe I want to terminate just before commit of transaction > 12345, but no later than 2018-11-11 12:47 in any case.
+1
