Hi, On 2018-11-26 12:30:06 +0300, Sergei Kornilov wrote: > Hmm... I considered SIGHUP processing was in fast loop and therefore shutdown > should be fast. But i recheck code and found a possible long loop without > processing SIGHUP (in case we receive new data faster than writes to disk). > Ok, i will revert back. > How about write to WalRcvData only clobbered conninfo?
I'm not sure I understand what you mean? The way I'd solve this is that that only walreceiver, at startup, writes out its conninfo/slot_name, sourcing the values from the GUCs. That way there's no issue with values being overwritten early. - Andres
