On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:23 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Corey Huinker <corey.huin...@gmail.com> writes: > > Could we have another output type called "separated" that uses the > existing > > --fieldsep / --recordsep? > > Uh, what's the difference from the existing unaligned format? > No footer and I guess we'd want to escape instances of fieldsep and recordsep in the data, so I guess if we had an option to escape instances of fieldsep/recordsep found in the data, unaligned would work fine.
