On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 6:07 AM Dmitry Dolgov <9erthali...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 1:55 PM Dmitry Dolgov <9erthali...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I've noticed, that patch has some conflicts, so here is the rebased version. > > Also, since people are concern about performance impact for arrays, I've > > done > > some tests similar to [1], but agains the current master - results are > > similar > > so far, I've got quite insignificant difference between the master and the > > patched version. > > > > [1]: > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2Bq6zcV8YCKcMHkUKiiUM3eOsq-ubb%3DT1D%2Bki4YbE%3DBYbt1PxQ%40mail.gmail.com > > One more rebased version. This time I also decided to use this opportunity, to > write more descriptive commit messages.
Hi Dmitry, Noticed on cfbot.cputube.org: pg_type.c:167:10: error: passing argument 3 of ‘GenerateTypeDependencies’ makes integer from pointer without a cast [-Werror] false); ^ In file included from pg_type.c:28:0: ../../../src/include/catalog/pg_type.h:335:13: note: expected ‘Oid’ but argument is of type ‘void *’ extern void GenerateTypeDependencies(Oid typeObjectId, ^ -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com
