On 9/26/18 12:20 PM, amul sul wrote:
Hi all,
Commit[1] has added 64-bit hash functions for core data types and in the same
discussion thread[2] Robert Haas suggested to have the similar extended hash
function for hstore and citext data type. Attaching patch proposes the same.
I wonder if the hstore hash function is actually correct. I see it
pretty much just computes hash on the varlena representation. The
important question is - can there be two different encodings for the
same hstore value? If that's possible, those two versions would end up
with a different hash value, breaking the hashing scheme.
I'm not very familiar with hstore internals so I don't know if that's
actually possible, but if you look at hstore_cmp, that seems to be far
more complex than just comparing the varlena values directly.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
