On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 05:14:33PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > JDBC has its own set of options with targetServerType: master, slave, > secondary, preferSlave and preferSecondary. What's proposed here is > preferSlave and what we would miss is slave at the end.
So thinking a couple of extra minutes on this one, I am wondering if it would be better to close completely the gap with two patches: 1) Get "read-only" done first, which uses most of the existing infrastructure. That seems simple enough. 2) Get "prefer-read" and "prefer-write", which need some new infrastructure to track the last preferred connection depending on what the client wants. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
