On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 5:03 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:37 PM John Naylor <jcnay...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > + In addition, extensions may have additional types. > > > > > > How about: "In addition, background workers registered by extensions > > > may have additional types."? > > > > Sounds good to me -- I've included this language. > > > > LGTM. I will wait for a day or so, if nobody has any comments, I will > push your patch. >
Pushed, thanks for working on this. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
