"Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.har...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 10:56 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> We could implement the clamp either in elog.c or in a GUC assignment
>> hook. If we do the latter, then SHOW and pg_settings would report the
>> effective value rather than what you set. That seems a bit cleaner
>> to me, and not without precedent. As far as the backwards compatibility
>> angle goes, you can invent scenarios in which either choice could be
>> argued to break something; but I think the most likely avenue for
>> trouble is if the visible setting doesn't match the actual behavior.
>> So I'm leaning to the assign-hook approach; comments?
> My patch used the check hook, but works either way.
I was deliberately not getting into the detail of which hook to use ;-).
Anyway, pushed with some adjustments and work on the documentation.
Notably, I thought the warning message was inappropriate and
overcomplicated, so I just dropped it. I don't think we really need
anything there.
regards, tom lane
