On 2018/11/08 18:03, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 04:46:46PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote: >> How about: >> When used on tables with inheritance children (including partitioned >> tables), this also drops the children (partitions). > > Even if the style gets heavier, I have also the following in my box: > When used on a partitioned table, this action drops its partitions and > when used on tables with inheritance children, it drops the depending > children.
I think we don't need to say "depending" children here, even though I know the dependency management system is involved internally. In the end, I will let you go with whatever you think is clearer. :) Thanks, Amit
