Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 9:45 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I'd vote against. I think there are way more cases where this would
>> create a problem than where it would fix one.
> Like what?
alter user postgres connection limit 0;
... oops ...
I'm not buying the argument that there are realistic use-cases where
you need a connection limit on a superuser role, either. Whatever
you're doing that might merit a connection limit should not be done
as superuser. I think this proposal boils down to asking for support
for an incredibly bad application design, and equipping every database
with an additional foot-gun in order to have that.
regards, tom lane
