В письме от 1 ноября 2018 11:10:14 пользователь Tom Lane написал:
> >>> I see you lost the Oxford comma: > >>> > >>> -DETAIL: Valid values are "on", "off", and "auto". > >>> +DETAIL: Valid values are "auto", "on" and "off". > >>> > >>> Please put these back. > >> > >> Actually that's me who have lost it. The code with oxford comma would be > >> a > >> bit more complicated. We should put such coma when we have 3+ items and > >> do not put it when we have 2. > >> > >> Does it worth it? > > > > In my opinion, it is worth it. > > Uh ... I've not been paying attention to this thread, but this exchange > seems to be about somebody constructing a message like that piece-by-piece > in code. This has got to be a complete failure from the translatability > standpoint. See > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/nls-programmer.html#NLS-GUIDELI > NES It's a very good reason... In this case the only solution I can see is DETAIL: Valid values are: "value1", "value2", "value3". Where list '"value1", "value2", "value3"' is built in runtime but have no any bindnings to any specific language. And the rest of the message is 'DETAIL: Valid values are: %s' which can be properly translated. -- Do code for fun.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
