On Mon, Nov 9, 2026 at 11:42 AM Michael Paquier <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2026 at 11:37:22AM +0800, Xuneng Zhou wrote: > >> There may be something with threading here, actually, we've > >> mentioned that as we could not rely on PIDs anymore, should the switch > >> to threads happen, then a concept of session number would be required. > >> If it is 8-byte wide, the PID rotation concern is moot. > > > > I don't follow this well. Does this mean that this is not a problem > > after threading? > > Under a threading infrastructure, PIDs have no meaning. So, assuming > that a concept of session IDs is used to replace how we internally > track each thread for the SQL interface, and assuming that this is 8 > byte wide, then the PID wraparound concerns would be entirely gone. > This relies on three ifs.
Thanks. It's clear to me now. -- Regards, Xuneng Zhou HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
