> On Oct 16, 2026, at 08:22, Baji Shaik <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2026 at 6:34 PM Fujii Masao <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2026 at 7:01 AM Baji Shaik <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> + line; but the setting can be overridden for individual tables by
>
> "overridden" should be "reduced" here? IIUC, this GUC remains an upper limit
> even when the table storage parameter is set, so the table parameter can
> lower the limit but cannot raise it. Both autovacuum_freeze_max_age and
> autovacuum_multixact_freeze_max_age seem to use "reduced" for the same
> reason.
>
> That's a good point. Thank you for the review and correction. v4 attached.
>
> Thanks,
> Baji Shaik.
> <v4-0001-doc-say-where-autovacuum_max_parallel_workers-can.patch>
V4 looks good to me. “Reduced” accurately describes the implementation:
parallel_vacuum_compute_workers() caps the table’s requested worker count at
autovacuum_max_parallel_workers.
Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/
