Matthias van de Meent <[email protected]> writes:
> On Thu, 15 Oct 2026 at 04:16, Chao Li <[email protected]> wrote:
>> After thinking it over, I think we can add a check for base 1 in log_var(),
>> and numeric_log() can just defer base 1 handling to log_var(). Please see
>> v2, which implements this approach.
> LGTM.
Works for me too. Pushed after a bit of comment-smithing.
I did not back-patch as you suggested, though. This behavior for
infinite input has been there for as long as we've had numeric
infinity, so I think the argument for changing it in stable branches
is pretty weak.
regards, tom lane
