On Thu, Oct 15, 2026 at 7:33 AM Zsolt Parragi <[email protected]> wrote: > Since (1) I think it's better if this thread doesn't depend on the > outcome of the other and (2) I think the v4 version was overall > simpler, I'm attaching the version of that with the original concerns > fixed as v6. I thought a bit more about the performance question, but > since we are already at the partitioned table code, it had to do the > same iterations anyway, so it didn't make the indexed case better, > even in theory.
Understood. Thanks for updating the patch! v6 looks good to me. Barring any objections, I'll commit it. Regards, -- Fujii Masao
