Hi Alvaro and Richard, Álvaro Herrera <[email protected]> writes: > we read a NULL value from a column that's marked as not-null, which > shouldn't happen.
One data point, this part is not new in 19. Your example reads the same NULL through the parent on 18.6. My initial idea is to just fix the PG19 regression instead of addressing the entire problem. > But I can see it breaks a > lot of things, and what this commit does is just to work-around one of > the things that design breaks. Agree, I think there is a design question here and a more completed fix should target 20. Thanks, Shihao
