On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 02:03:32AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 01:11 Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: >> or the new checksum validation logic complaining about them, and such >>> when doing backups and I wonder if that is because people simply don’t >>> use the two together much, making me wonder how much of an issue this >>> really is or would be with the account-for-everything approach I’ve >>> been advocating for. >> >> I mean obviously pg_verify_checksum simply hasn't been actually tested >> much with plain postgres without extensions, given the all weaknesses >> identified in this thread. > > No, it hasn’t, but pg_basebackup has been around quite a while and has > always copied everything, as best as I can recall anyway.
At this point, let's create a new thread with a description of what has been discussed and what we'd like to do for HEAD and v11. I got something in mind which would result in a minimal patch. Let's start from that. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
