On Wed, Sep 2, 2026 at 8:16 AM Michael Paquier <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 11:28:13AM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote: > > Yeah, after staring at this some more, v1 seems reasonable to proceed with > > for v19 from an RMT perspective. I've alerted Melanie and Heikki in case > > they want to share opinions, too. > > Hearing nothing, I have expanded the tests in v1 with more option > patterns, and applied it down to v19.
I was about to deal with this issue. Thank you for pushing v1, I'll take a look at v2 for v20. ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov Supabase
