I don't find any documentation for the WAIT FOR NO_THROW option other
than a few short sentences in the man page about what it does
technically. But I don't find anything about why one would want to use
it (or not). I suspect this option was added with some particular
client control flow in mind, but I think this needs to be explained
somewhere.
- WAIT FOR NO_THROW option could use some documenta... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: WAIT FOR NO_THROW option could use some ... Rithvika Devisetti
- Re: WAIT FOR NO_THROW option could use s... Kiran Kaki
- Re: WAIT FOR NO_THROW option could u... Xuneng Zhou
- Re: WAIT FOR NO_THROW option cou... Kiran Kaki
- Re: WAIT FOR NO_THROW option cou... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: WAIT FOR NO_THROW optio... Xuneng Zhou
- Re: WAIT FOR NO_THROW o... SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM
- Re: WAIT FOR NO_THR... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: WAIT FOR NO_THR... SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM
- Re: WAIT FOR NO_THR... Xuneng Zhou
