Hi, On 2018/10/15 19:04, Krzysztof Nienartowicz wrote: > > We see quite prohibitive 5-6x slowdown with native partitioning on in > comparison to trigger based in PG9.5. > This is clearly visible with highly parallel inserts (Can share > flamediagrams comparing the two). > > This basically excludes native partitioning from being used by us. Do you > think your changes could be backported to PG10? - we checked and this would > need quite a number of changes but given the weight of this change maybe it > could be considered?
It's unfortunate that PG 10's partitioning cannot be used for your use case, but I don't think such a major refactoring will be back-ported to 10 or 11. :-( Thanks, Amit
