On Fri, 7 Aug 2026 05:50:55 +0000 Koshino Taiki <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thank you for pushing this. > > Let me suggest one more small fix. > > Since the preceding word is plural, the acronym should probably be > pluralized too: (<acronym>MXID</acronym>s) rather than > (<acronym>MXID</acronym>). > > This matches existing conventions elsewhere in the docs, e.g. MCVs > (most common values) and MCFs (most common frequencies) in > planstats.sgml. I agree with this suggestion. Since we already use pluralized acronyms such as MCVs and MCFs in the documentation, "Multixact IDs (MXIDs)" seems more consistent to me than "Multixact IDs (MXID)". Regards, Yugo Nagata > > Taiki Koshino<[email protected]> > SRA OSS K.K. > TEL: 03-5979-2701 FAX: 03-5979-2702 > URL: https://www.sraoss.co.jp/ > > ________________________________ > 差出人: Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]> > 送信日時: 2026年8月6日 21:12 > 宛先: Koshino Taiki <[email protected]> > CC: [email protected] <[email protected]> > 件名: Re: Define MXID acronym in documentation > > > On 5 Aug 2026, at 07:17, Koshino Taiki <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I noticed that while XID (Transaction ID) is properly defined as an > > acronym in the PostgreSQL documentation, MXID (Multixact ID) is used > > without a formal definition. > > > > This patch adds an entry for MXID to acronyms.sgml with a link to the > > "Multixacts and Wraparound" section, and introduces the acronym in > > maintenance.sgml alongside the existing "Multixact IDs" term, following > > the same pattern used for XID. > > Good find, pushed. Thanks for your contribution! > > -- > Daniel Gustafsson > -- Yugo Nagata <[email protected]>
