Andrei Lepikhov <[email protected]> writes: > On 21/08/2026 17:20, Tom Lane wrote: >> I'm certainly not going to risk putting in half-considered >> support for such a thing at this stage of the release cycle. >> There's enough risk in adding what I proposed yesterday.
> No objection. It closes the case the thread started from and the pg_dump part
> is
> what v0 was missing.
OK, pushed v3 then.
regards, tom lane
