Michael Paquier <[email protected]> writes:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2026 at 10:26:33AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> +1. I'd be inclined to think about removing execdebug.h altogether.
>> If this style of debug support were really useful, it would have
>> migrated into more than three kinds of executor node by now.
> Please find attached a patch to clean up execdebug.h and its APIs.
> How does that look?
LGTM. There are a few places in the calling files where I might've
removed more blank lines than you did, or removed no-longer-necessary
brace pairs, but that's all a matter of taste.
regards, tom lane
