On Mon, 2026-07-13 at 11:06 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 08:58:22AM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote: > > I don't know if the omission to check for identical PERMISSIVE or > > RESTRICTIVE settings can lead to real problems, but I feel that it > > violates the promise of the function. So I am +1 on this change. > > That does not make sense here, two policies with a different > polpermissive are not the same, or am I missing something?
I think we agree. I probably did not express myself well. I am for fixing the function the way Andreas suggested. I just wasn't sure if the omission was intentional or not; your research says it was a mistake. Yours, Laurenz Albe
