On Thu, Jul 9, 2026 at 6:45 AM Amit Kapila <[email protected]> wrote: > I am getting following regression diff even after applying the patch: > -step s1_split: <... completed> > step s2_scan: > SELECT count(*) FROM hash_split_test > WHERE v = (SELECT k FROM hash_split_key); > @@ -68,3 +67,4 @@ > 11 > (1 row)
This is just a minor test flakiness issue with the isolation test. Apparently, we need to force a deterministic report position by adding a no-op step to the splitter's session. Attached v2 has a more stable version of the isolation test (no other changes compared to V1). Does this version work for you? The isolation test is just for illustrative purposes. I don't think that it's committable. -- Peter Geoghegan
v2-0001-Fix-hash-index-scans-concurrent-with-bucket-split.patch
Description: Binary data
v2-0002-Add-tests-for-hash-index-scans-concurrent-with-bu.patch
Description: Binary data
