On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 04:56:11AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 01:52:54PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 04:27:55AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote: > > > postgres=# select read_time from pg_stat_io where read_time > 0; > > > read_time > > > --------------------- > > > 2.2640000000000002 > > > 0.08700000000000001 > > > > > > Maybe it should be changed to? > > > > pg_stat_io with track_io_timing enabled shows the same thing. > > Yeah, I agree, my query above is querying pg_stat_io. I agree that it makes > sense to have both using pg_stat_us_to_ms(), I'm just wondering if > pg_stat_us_to_ms() > should be changed as I did propose.
FWIW, I just created a dedicated thread [1] for this (to not deviate from the original purpose of this one). [1]: https://postgr.es/m/akIYkMK4bHe9qX/N%40bdtpg Regards, -- Bertrand Drouvot PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
